Forum Navigation
Welcome to Kikizo's Forum Archives. Login and user functionality is no longer available -- this is now a permanent archive of forum content.

Prev Thread Prev Thread   Next Thread Next Thread
 Starcraft 2 specs emerge
Author Message
Kelvinellenton

  • Total Posts : 454
  • Joined: Mar 30, 2008
  • Location: Denmark
Starcraft 2 specs emerge - May 23, 2008 02:14

Minimum Requirements:

GFX: GeForce 7/8 Series or Radeon 1000/2000 with 25Mb RAM
CPU: Pentium 4
RAM: 1Gb
Internet: ADSL 1 MBit

Recommend Requirements:

GFX: GeForce 8000 or Radeon 2000 series with 512Mb RAM
CPU: Core 2 Duo or Athlon X2
RAM: 2Gb
Internet: ADSL 3 Mbit

Optimal Requirements:

GFX: Geforce 9000er or Radeon 3000er Series
CPU: Core 2 Duo 3 Ghz or Athlon X2
RAM: 2Gb with DualChannel mode.


Very high for Blizzard I think. As far as I can understand, WoW doesn' t require much for example

Source
mikayd2

  • Total Posts : 1129
  • Joined: Apr 26, 2006
RE: Starcraft 2 specs emerge - May 23, 2008 02:55
Oh I got this covered easy.
Cant wait to play this game.
Agent Ghost

  • Total Posts : 5486
  • Joined: Aug 09, 2006
RE: Starcraft 2 specs emerge - May 23, 2008 03:24
This game is going to be sexy.
locopuyo

  • Total Posts : 3138
  • Joined: Jan 10, 2005
  • Location: Minneapolis
RE: Starcraft 2 specs emerge - May 23, 2008 03:41
What!? You mean my 350mhz PII and voodoo 3 won' t be able to run it?
killemoff

  • Total Posts : 173
  • Joined: Sep 28, 2007
RE: Starcraft 2 specs emerge - May 23, 2008 06:15


ORIGINAL: locopuyo

What!? You mean my 350mhz PII and voodoo 3 won' t be able to run it?


Afraid so, sorry.
locopuyo

  • Total Posts : 3138
  • Joined: Jan 10, 2005
  • Location: Minneapolis
RE: Starcraft 2 specs emerge - May 23, 2008 13:55
It would be nice if it supports multiple monitors like supreme commander. You can select 2 monitors using 2 different video cards, or hte same video card in that game. I don' t know if you can do more than 2 if you have the capability. Probably not. But it is pretty sweet because you basically just get 2 seperate views of the battlefield. I' m probably going to build my next computer with support for 4 monitors but if SC supported 4 I would go all out.
UnluckyOne

  • Total Posts : 995
  • Joined: Jul 16, 2005
RE: Starcraft 2 specs emerge - May 23, 2008 18:20
Supreme Commander has such an intuitive interface that I find myself trying to use the scroll zoom/map in games that don' t support it.


Blizzard has yet to confirm the specs, so far only confirming that the game will require Pixel Shader 2.0.


These specs are rumors and look to be pretty fake.

Listing the GF9 series as superior to the GF8 series = Bogus
Coupling a measly P4 CPU with a GF8 = Bogus
The multitude of spelling mistakes = Bogus

It looks like it was typed up by a 5 year old. Blizzard says it' ll require PS2.0, so that means probably Geforce 6 or X800 minimum. SC2 doesn' t even look that good, so unless Blizzard fail in optimization, it' ll be far below what' s listed here. It also has to work on the millions of average Korean PC' s, or else they' ll have some serious backlash.
< Message edited by UnluckyOne -- 23 May 08 10:26:25 >
GrayFox

  • Total Posts : 356
  • Joined: Sep 20, 2006
RE: Starcraft 2 specs emerge - May 24, 2008 02:12


ORIGINAL: UnluckyOne

Supreme Commander has such an intuitive interface that I find myself trying to use the scroll zoom/map in games that don' t support it.


Blizzard has yet to confirm the specs, so far only confirming that the game will require Pixel Shader 2.0.


These specs are rumors and look to be pretty fake.

Listing the GF9 series as superior to the GF8 series = Bogus
Coupling a measly P4 CPU with a GF8 = Bogus
The multitude of spelling mistakes = Bogus

It looks like it was typed up by a 5 year old. Blizzard says it' ll require PS2.0, so that means probably Geforce 6 or X800 minimum. SC2 doesn' t even look that good, so unless Blizzard fail in optimization, it' ll be far below what' s listed here. It also has to work on the millions of average Korean PC' s, or else they' ll have some serious backlash.



Yeah seemed bogus to mee too. It doesnt make sense. and whats with the " 9000er" ?
locopuyo

  • Total Posts : 3138
  • Joined: Jan 10, 2005
  • Location: Minneapolis
RE: Starcraft 2 specs emerge - May 24, 2008 03:27


ORIGINAL: UnluckyOne

Supreme Commander has such an intuitive interface that I find myself trying to use the scroll zoom/map in games that don' t support it.


Blizzard has yet to confirm the specs, so far only confirming that the game will require Pixel Shader 2.0.


These specs are rumors and look to be pretty fake.

Listing the GF9 series as superior to the GF8 series = Bogus
Coupling a measly P4 CPU with a GF8 = Bogus
The multitude of spelling mistakes = Bogus

It looks like it was typed up by a 5 year old. Blizzard says it' ll require PS2.0, so that means probably Geforce 6 or X800 minimum. SC2 doesn' t even look that good, so unless Blizzard fail in optimization, it' ll be far below what' s listed here. It also has to work on the millions of average Korean PC' s, or else they' ll have some serious backlash.


I was thinking the same thing.
emofag

  • Total Posts : 1508
  • Joined: Apr 01, 2007
RE: Starcraft 2 specs emerge - May 24, 2008 10:46
How is it very high?

Even if it was fake, 8000 series for reccomended could simply mean the game will fly on something like an 8600GT which is very cheap, only like $80?

And WoW has low specs because it' s an MMORPG and the amount of things on screen s unpredictable.

With an 8800GTX WoW still chugs when there' s hundreds of people on screen, as rare as that is.
< Message edited by emofag -- 24 May 08 2:53:37 >

Jump to:

Icon Legend and Permission
  • New Messages
  • No New Messages
  • Hot Topic w/ New Messages
  • Hot Topic w/o New Messages
  • Locked w/ New Messages
  • Locked w/o New Messages
  • Read Message
  • Post New Thread
  • Reply to message
  • Post New Poll
  • Submit Vote
  • Post reward post
  • Delete my own posts
  • Delete my own threads
  • Rate post