30 fps is more then fine,stop pretending that its laggy ffs.

I hope developers dont have think the same as u Quez.. we' ll be playing 30fps games for the next few generations down the line also.. imagine that

" No need to worry, becuase of ps3 games run at 120fps. 360 is crap!!! lol lol lol!!11!!"

" Xbox 360? more like GAY-box 1.5"

" The ps3 is not a games console, its that skynet software from the terminator films that trys to take over the world, by causeing nuclear wars and wiping out man kind x10. in other words Its a super coumputer really"

- Ken.

ORIGINAL: Silentbomber

" No need to worry, becuase of ps3 games run at 120fps. 360 is crap!!! lol lol lol!!11!!"

" Xbox 360? more like GAY-box 1.5"

" The ps3 is not a games console, its that skynet software from the terminator films that trys to take over the world, by causeing nuclear wars and wiping out man kind x10. in other words Its a super coumputer really"

- Ken.

The sad thing is that most 8 and 16-bit games ran at 60fps. By that I don' t mean there were 60 differnt frames of sprite animation per second, but the screen scrolled and updated 60 times a second and as a result it was smooth. Enter the 3DO. Enter bad frame rates. The Playstation and Saturn would continue this and here we are today.

I could understand in the Saturn and playstation days when the hardware couldn’t cut it, sometimes even with the GC, Xbox and PS2 days... but in this generation its just unacceptable and Lazy.

...100% agreement.....

...btw, have any PS3 games been shown or confirmed running at 120fps?.....

30FPS is just perfect, id rather have more detail. Unless its a fast game like UT!

120 fps? there are hardly any games that run in 1080p for now so 120fps is something Sony shouldn' t focus on now :)

30FPS is OK - 60 FPS kicks ASS and the difference is huge ,but if you don' t have a choice (like HAlo) it' s still good at 30fps

like some of you said -it is totally unacceptable for any next gen title to run at 30FPS - devs are just lazy.

I think 30 fps is ok but if 60 is reachable (like someone said) I can' t see why not push it there it is ' ' next gen' ' after all.

As for 120...there are developers still struggling to get to 60 still (aparently) but i' d be satisfied immensly with 60.

well done you are the first that have the same opinions
with me.
read my answers on nintendo wii post
you are right 360 games have terrible frame issues
and all said " developers dont make it"
frames depents from the power of machine.
dreamcast was a true next gen machine back then
plus in 2 years they have launch more AAA games than any other machine OR
developer and almost all was running at 60 fps what was they magicians?
no the machine was true next gen guys.
think before you buy

tell them to forget 120 fps
even if it dones
your eyes can see until 60 after you only see speed increase
what are we flys?
and if any developer does this the graphics will be worst than ps2
for that reason none will launch at 120
prey guys for 60 its the best option and the games
will look very cinematic like mgs series at least at cut scenes they are
60 fps locked with no colors or textures and you think that
this is a movie

The sad thing is that most 8 and 16-bit games ran at 60fps

Bow down to the superior but marginaly inferior Games of the olden days!

There aren' t any TVs that can run at 120fps.

there are at 100 fps