Forget about the fuel, think of the driving experience as the gameplay experience. You' re talking about marketshare, I' m talking about quality. Honda has a greater marketshare than Ferrari and Porsche because Civics are more affordable. Lets be honest though, we all know which cars we' d rather sit in.
Obviously this is all about the games. You seem to think that the driving experience depends on car sales, which is a fallacy. Think of each car representing a console platform and all of the games and features that the platform will support are part of the driving experience.
It doesn' t matter how many Honda Civics they sell, they' re still just Civics, and a Wii will never be more than a Wii. Now there' s nothing wrong with Civics, they' ll get you around just fine. But that' s it, don' t expect much better than fine. Now a Porsche and Ferrari on the other hand are a different story. Have you ever been in a Porshe or Ferrari? I have been in both and they' re better than fine.
Wii will never get anything comparable with titles like Mass Effect, Oblivion, MGS4, Bioshock, Gears,PGR4,Halo3, LAIR, GTA4, The Darkness, UT III etc...
I' m not saying Wii will fail business wise, Nintendo didn' t risk a lot and the results will show that, both economically and practically. Wii has a place with gamers but don' t expect miracles from the little console that could.
Before you run off in a tangent about the wiimote and innovation, please spare yourself the embarrassment. The wiimote is nothing but a gimmick, misdirection to distract consumers from the fact that Wii is simply a repackaged GameCube. If I buy a Wii, I' ll try to avoid using it whenever possible. I have no intrest in the Wiimote at all. If I wanted to play with a white wand the wiimote wouldn' t be my first choice. And I certainly wouldn' t want to play with it while gaming.
< Message edited by Agent Ghost -- 18 Jun 07 5:05:07 >