Anyone mentioned publishers?

And, So what if Nintendo wanted to these games out? does that take aways the masses of Orignal Gameplay elements Nintendo 1st parties have been implimenting in their new games?

No it does not..

END

Please refresh my memory, give me masses of Original gameplay elements please!

Quite the opposite, Mario Party is developed by Hudson not Nintendo you freakin fools.

It' s a Nintendo game because it stars Nintendo characters and is a Nintendo console exclusive. I couldn' t care less what name they' re under. If Nintendo wanted Mario Party to change, they would have voiced that, & it would have happened. They seem soft compared with Sony & Microsoft' s " iron fist" approach, but if they wanted something new, they' d get it. There' s no doubt about that.

What? back to dig that hole even deeper?

It would have made much more sense putting Immortal right by stating Nintendo' s obvious new approach towards gaming.

Instead, you' d rather team up against such a clear factual claim on the basis of one game title (which u ***ed on btw) which bares absolutely no relevance to my original claim. (if you read it properly, that is.)

Like it or not, Nintendo are pushing new gameplay element' s, more than any other developer.. Even if Nintendo wants to fill gaps with generic spin off' s, they can afford to!!, does not take away the new elements they have been focusing on recently.

Argue properly, with valid claims that bare relevance or just leave it.

I cannot believe people with half a brain cell or some knowledge about the industry would even argue against this. It' s just pig headed and dam right ignorant.

END.

Like it or not, Nintendo are pushing new gameplay element' s, more than any other developer.. Even if Nintendo wants to fill gaps with generic spin off' s, they can afford to!!, does not take away the new elements they have been focusing on recently.

Argue properly, with valid claims that bare relevance or just leave it.

I cannot believe people with half a brain cell or some knowledge about the industry would even argue against this. It' s just pig headed and dam right ignorant.

Besides the Wii mote, where is the innovation? Im not saying Sony, or MS, or even someone else is more innovative, but im not falling down on the floor with amazement of what nintendo is pulling off, up untill now its been very unimpressive

I like the Wii, no doubt about that, but its still more a gimmick than anything else, i cant see it " revolutionizing" the way i play games, and i cant see " next next gen" consoles all utilizing a " wii mote" system.

Innovation to me is about a lot more than how you control the games, its still early in the Wii' s life, but there are no impressive games out for it yet (with the exception of Zelda, which im hard pressed to call a Gamecube title)

Sure they changed the controller, but it wont be good for all kinds of games, innovation isnt always good!

Please, prove me wrong, i want to hear the MASS innovation nintendo has done!

Nintendo are very innovative!
For example:

They' re selling cheap hardware (Wii) for the same price as much more advanced hardware (360). That is very innovative. Such a brilliant idea: less power, higher price.

Or how about this, talk all about how amazing a console and its controller is and make millions of people buy it, then DON' T make any games for it the first year. Who would' ve thought of that innovative idea? Not a single company except Nintendo.

Also, the Wii is getting tons of Wii-makes, one of the most innovative moves the industry has ever seen. Take an old game, put in some Wii-mote control and viola! A new innovative game!

But their most innovative move the past years would have to be the decision to forbid all 3rd party companies to make online games for the Wii. I mean, every company is really focusing on online gameplay so can it get more inovative than doing the exact opposite? I say it can' t!



Gahaha, just messin with ya! I love Nintendo. The Wii just sucks so far that' s all.

Nintendo are very innovative!
For example:

They' re selling cheap hardware (Wii) for the same price as much more advanced hardware (360). That is very innovative. Such a brilliant idea: less power, higher price.

Or how about this, talk all about how amazing a console and its controller is and make millions of people buy it, then DON' T make any games for it the first year. Who would' ve thought of that innovative idea? Not a single company except Nintendo.

Also, the Wii is getting tons of Wii-makes, one of the most innovative moves the industry has ever seen. Take an old game, put in some Wii-mote control and viola! A new innovative game!

But their most innovative move the past years would have to be the decision to forbid all 3rd party companies to make online games for the Wii. I mean, every company is really focusing on online gameplay so can it get more inovative than doing the exact opposite? I say it can' t!



Gahaha, just messin with ya! I love Nintendo. The Wii just sucks so far that' s all.

The funny thing is though, its all true, we all like nintendo, but Wii still has to live up to the hype!