New Phantom Hourglass screens!

If the whole game looked like the last picture, i would be a little intrested :(

Can' t wait for this game. Reminds me of the Wind Waker which is definitely a good thing!

If the whole game looked like the last picture, i would be a little intrested :(

Graphics whore..

You will never be interested, it reeks too much of great gameplay.

Can' t wait for this game. Reminds me of the Wind Waker which is definitely a good thing!

It may have the same look of Wind waker but also packed full of totally original gameplay elements, something other console / developers outside Nintendo severely lack these days..

Really looking forward to playing through this.!

Currently playing:
Korg DS 10 (ds) /  Metal Slug 7 (ds)
Rhythm Heaven (ds) /  Fire Emblem (ds)
Super Stardust HD (psn) /  Virtua Fighter 5 (360)
FSX (P

graphics look nice, the cell shaded look carried on well onto the nds.

Change is inevitable. Except from a vending machine.

Viva La Revolution! erm, I mean Viva La Wii!

Lookin' Good!

Graphics whore..

You will never be interested, it reeks too much of great gameplay.

Its nothing about being a graphical whore, its baout the game not being a top down RPG when the DS should be able to make it look like OoT even with the windwaker style graphs!

Yay! This could turn out like the Wind Waker/A Link To The Past hybrid I was hoping for!

Its nothing about being a graphical whore, its baout the game not being a top down RPG when the DS should be able to make it look like OoT even with the windwaker style graphs!

Don' t be discouraged. You might actually enjoy the game anyway, for all you know. Although the DS could handle Mario 64 and Final Fantasy III, I' d still much rather play a top-down Zelda on a handheld anyway.

It may have the same look of Wind waker but also packed full of totally original gameplay elements, something other console / developers outside Nintendo severely lack these days..

...Mario Party 8...

I dont want to celebrate, I want to sell you hate.

This is the part where I follow up Dan' s response with some witty and highly-intelligent remark... but I think it speaks for itself.

This is the part where I follow up Dan' s response with some witty and highly-intelligent remark... but I think it speaks for itself.

heh.. (thought the same thing myself)

Currently playing:
Korg DS 10 (ds) /  Metal Slug 7 (ds)
Rhythm Heaven (ds) /  Fire Emblem (ds)
Super Stardust HD (psn) /  Virtua Fighter 5 (360)
FSX (P

heh.. (thought the same thing myself)

So youre completely agreeing with me like Eddie was?

I dont want to celebrate, I want to sell you hate.

So youre completely agreeing with me like Eddie was?

Quite the opposite, Mario Party is developed by Hudson not Nintendo you freakin fools.

Currently playing:
Korg DS 10 (ds) /  Metal Slug 7 (ds)
Rhythm Heaven (ds) /  Fire Emblem (ds)
Super Stardust HD (psn) /  Virtua Fighter 5 (360)
FSX (P

Owned!

" Quite the opposite, Mario Party is developed by Hudson not Nintendo you freakin fools."

So what? They' re published by Nintendo! It doesn' t matter who physically creates the games, the fact remains that Nintendo wants the games made in the first place.

So what? They' re published by Nintendo! It doesn' t matter who physically creates the games, the fact remains that Nintendo wants the games made in the first place.

I agree, Mario Party is even worse than the Fifa series, innovation died!

Anyone mentioned publishers?

And, So what if Nintendo wanted to these games out? does that take aways the masses of Orignal Gameplay elements Nintendo 1st parties have been implimenting in their new games?

No it does not..

END

Currently playing:
Korg DS 10 (ds) /  Metal Slug 7 (ds)
Rhythm Heaven (ds) /  Fire Emblem (ds)
Super Stardust HD (psn) /  Virtua Fighter 5 (360)
FSX (P

sigh

I really liked wind waker, if it is like that I' ll end up giving this a try

Anyone mentioned publishers?

And, So what if Nintendo wanted to these games out? does that take aways the masses of Orignal Gameplay elements Nintendo 1st parties have been implimenting in their new games?

No it does not..

END

Please refresh my memory, give me masses of Original gameplay elements please!

Quite the opposite, Mario Party is developed by Hudson not Nintendo you freakin fools.

It' s a Nintendo game because it stars Nintendo characters and is a Nintendo console exclusive. I couldn' t care less what name they' re under. If Nintendo wanted Mario Party to change, they would have voiced that, & it would have happened. They seem soft compared with Sony & Microsoft' s " iron fist" approach, but if they wanted something new, they' d get it. There' s no doubt about that.

What? back to dig that hole even deeper?

It would have made much more sense putting Immortal right by stating Nintendo' s obvious new approach towards gaming.

Instead, you' d rather team up against such a clear factual claim on the basis of one game title (which u ***ed on btw) which bares absolutely no relevance to my original claim. (if you read it properly, that is.)

Like it or not, Nintendo are pushing new gameplay element' s, more than any other developer.. Even if Nintendo wants to fill gaps with generic spin off' s, they can afford to!!, does not take away the new elements they have been focusing on recently.

Argue properly, with valid claims that bare relevance or just leave it.

I cannot believe people with half a brain cell or some knowledge about the industry would even argue against this. It' s just pig headed and dam right ignorant.

END.

Currently playing:
Korg DS 10 (ds) /  Metal Slug 7 (ds)
Rhythm Heaven (ds) /  Fire Emblem (ds)
Super Stardust HD (psn) /  Virtua Fighter 5 (360)
FSX (P

Like it or not, Nintendo are pushing new gameplay element' s, more than any other developer.. Even if Nintendo wants to fill gaps with generic spin off' s, they can afford to!!, does not take away the new elements they have been focusing on recently.

Argue properly, with valid claims that bare relevance or just leave it.

I cannot believe people with half a brain cell or some knowledge about the industry would even argue against this. It' s just pig headed and dam right ignorant.

Besides the Wii mote, where is the innovation? Im not saying Sony, or MS, or even someone else is more innovative, but im not falling down on the floor with amazement of what nintendo is pulling off, up untill now its been very unimpressive

I like the Wii, no doubt about that, but its still more a gimmick than anything else, i cant see it " revolutionizing" the way i play games, and i cant see " next next gen" consoles all utilizing a " wii mote" system.

Innovation to me is about a lot more than how you control the games, its still early in the Wii' s life, but there are no impressive games out for it yet (with the exception of Zelda, which im hard pressed to call a Gamecube title)

Sure they changed the controller, but it wont be good for all kinds of games, innovation isnt always good!

Please, prove me wrong, i want to hear the MASS innovation nintendo has done!

Nintendo are very innovative!
For example:

They' re selling cheap hardware (Wii) for the same price as much more advanced hardware (360). That is very innovative. Such a brilliant idea: less power, higher price.

Or how about this, talk all about how amazing a console and its controller is and make millions of people buy it, then DON' T make any games for it the first year. Who would' ve thought of that innovative idea? Not a single company except Nintendo.

Also, the Wii is getting tons of Wii-makes, one of the most innovative moves the industry has ever seen. Take an old game, put in some Wii-mote control and viola! A new innovative game!

But their most innovative move the past years would have to be the decision to forbid all 3rd party companies to make online games for the Wii. I mean, every company is really focusing on online gameplay so can it get more inovative than doing the exact opposite? I say it can' t!



Gahaha, just messin with ya! I love Nintendo. The Wii just sucks so far that' s all.

Nintendo are very innovative!
For example:

They' re selling cheap hardware (Wii) for the same price as much more advanced hardware (360). That is very innovative. Such a brilliant idea: less power, higher price.

Or how about this, talk all about how amazing a console and its controller is and make millions of people buy it, then DON' T make any games for it the first year. Who would' ve thought of that innovative idea? Not a single company except Nintendo.

Also, the Wii is getting tons of Wii-makes, one of the most innovative moves the industry has ever seen. Take an old game, put in some Wii-mote control and viola! A new innovative game!

But their most innovative move the past years would have to be the decision to forbid all 3rd party companies to make online games for the Wii. I mean, every company is really focusing on online gameplay so can it get more inovative than doing the exact opposite? I say it can' t!



Gahaha, just messin with ya! I love Nintendo. The Wii just sucks so far that' s all.

The funny thing is though, its all true, we all like nintendo, but Wii still has to live up to the hype!