Maybe they should have gone for a full 100 nights instead

Edge gaved it 6/10.

Its very repetive and has a cheesy story.

I told majik/tiz about it when i got the demo,that its very funny,but gonna get low scores thanks to that.

Anyway my point is,some critics doesnt even seem to play their games.

Gamedaily had a reviewer who gaved Bmfe2 4/5 havin a complain that there was no tutriol in the full game,even though there is one + advance one.

When people checked his gamertga it was shown he only played 2 levels in the whole game,2 weeks after the launch.

WTF?!

Yeah ofcourse, but it dont seem to me that IGN didnt play the game, as the comment on both the beginning and the end! Its not a game for me, i found it boring after the first 5 minutes!

In all honesty I kinda found the demo was beggining to be boring but that was before I actually started moving the story along (cos I couldn find the goblin guy and forgot what I was doing) so i' m still looking forward to it.

Yes,if you find it boring after 5 min.
You should not play anymore.

ORIGINAL: QuezcatoL

Yes,if you find it boring after 5 min.
You should not play anymore.

Did you read what I said???????? or are you just commentig for the sake of it.

Was meant to be written to Chemical.

ORIGINAL: QuezcatoL

Was meant to be written to Chemical.

Oh I apologise.

Any way its funny that a game which have had so high expectations to score to low, if they have been hyped they rarely score below 8

I' m pretty sure that the whole game is gonna be ore interesting than the demo iv' e been wearing out so i' ll wait until I play it to say, but I don' think 5.6 is fair at all.

Maybe the game is crap?

that was a bad review... poor game. I hope all the games aimed at the japanese market aren' t as badly received.

The demo isn' t crap at all.

And i seen other videos,as for ex when you fight tons of goblins and orcs in and outside a castle,feels very much repetive to the demo mission but with a diffrent enviorment.
But still i wanna play it!!!

I have to agree, the demo isn' t bad at all. Quite addictive actually.

There' s nothing more satisfying than Aspharr' s " Void of Light" that vacuum' s
all the enemies.

I can see where people get the idea it' s repetitive, of course it is quite hard to
shake the stereotype of the hack n' slash genre. But side-by-side other
titles belonging to this genre, N3 is probably the best, because I didn' t like games
of this genre really, until I tried the N3 demo.

I can understand the 5.9 score - it' s IGN, the same people that had Ninja Gaiden
pegged for release with the PS2.

(Of course I can trust them(!))

Just wait until we review it! We' re slapping that baby with a 2.5/10!!!!!1!!! Exciting times I tell ya

*runs*

ORIGINAL: Terry Bogard

Just wait until we review it! We' re slapping that baby with a 2.5/10!!!!!1!!! Exciting times I tell ya

If that' s the case, can I review it?

**Rubs hands vigorously**

I can' t really say that I' m surprised about the low review scores. Looking forward to playing it for myself though

Did I not tell all of you the game sucked?

Yeah, it sucks.

Get over it.

I hope none of you ever work for any game journalism website or magazine because most of you really are fucking retarded, the only way you can think N3 doesn' t suck is if you are a fucking imbecile. I mean it' s not even a little good, no, its absolute garbage. I' d give it 4/10 personally.

it' s funny that KIKIZO forum is the only place where gamers anjoy almost every 7/10 game as if it was an AAA hit.

They don' t see problems with their games, they focus on good stuff and (I don' t know how they do it) see only the good things.It' s like a deep denial phase.

They never agree with 90% of reviews and gamers on the net.

Mmmm its called sense! it would be boring if only the AAA games got purchased. that way the buisness would too easily become generic!

Some titles that get low scores are from new developers trying new ideas! a game with 7 out of 10 would easily be on my wishlist if it indeed was a genre that i like or a series that i like!