I thought the same, and Mass Effect looks as great as this, and will feature more play time than Kill Zone, probably 3 or 4 times more.

Not to argue about the DVD vs BluRay debate, this is just to adress the fact that you cannot compare the length of a fps to an RPG ever. An rpg can easily take 5 times as long to get through an area the same size as an FPS. Baldurs Gate II is a prime example of that. I' ve never worked so hard to make such little progress in an single player RPG.

I think Killzone has more details and stuff on the levels compared to Mass Effect.

Killzone 2 is the best next-gen console looking game period.

You get the results if you put in the work.....

Man, oh man, why couldn' t they do this with MotorStorm...?

You no likeh teh Motorstorm? You don' t have a JP copy do you?

Killzone 2 is the best next-gen console looking game period.

You get the results if you put in the work.....

Man, oh man, why couldn' t they do this with MotorStorm...?

Killzone really isnt too much more impressive than Gears of War, and the gameplay looks very Quake 2' ish.

ORIGINAL: Vx Chemical

Killzone really isnt too much more impressive than Gears of War, and the gameplay looks very Quake 2' ish.

CG vs realtime/gameplay...

It seems like people still want to hate on the game, is it the platform it' s on?

The game look great, no doubt sony have gotten what they are paying for - how much further will it come when it' s released?? Can' t wait to see.

The Blu-Ray comment, who cares, it' s gonna be said because they want to push blu ray as very important. But either way it makes no difference to gamers, so long as we can play the game.

Gameplay is obviously the area most skeptical, Ther first had a lot of hype over visuals, i hope GG really put the effort in. Though with sony spending so much on it, i can' t see them turning out a crap game... It' ll be good/solid i think, just maybe not great.

My vote' s locked in at a solid 8.9, which is more than good enough for me.

I' m just worried they won' t do anything with their lame sniper rifle. That thing really really sucked.[:' (]

I never played the original Killzone myself. I have only seen it. It looked fun but you guys say it was bad... was it really that bad?

Certain parts were epic and rather awesome, but the frustrating visual & gameplay glitches combined with akwardly placed checkpoints made for less than an amazing experience. Online was almost decent on it for a while, but everything on PS2' s playstation " nothing" has gone down since next-gen began.

Sounds like it would be easy to fix those problems in a sequel... which I bet they have in Killzone 2!

Yeah, it honestly just felt rushed. I' m sure Sony wanted to get their potential " Halo-killer" clean out the door, & they really sacrificed what would have really been a good game. I' d suggest buying it now that it' s so old. I bought mine used for 9 bucks. It' s at least worth that.

I believe that this will turn out to be a great game. They' re going to fix the problems with gameply from the first Killzone, and I really can' t wait to hear more news on the multiplayer aspect of the game.

Nice Comparisons Nitro

There' s no denying that KZ2 clearly shows a technical gap between 360 and PS3. IT was actually a prediction i made on these forums a few months before (but was instantly labelled a PS3 fanboy for it).


Looks the part, now i wonder if it supports the new Rumbleshock?

I don' t think it' s your opinions that make some people call you a fanboy. It' s the way you say it.

Nice Comparisons Nitro

There' s no denying that KZ2 clearly shows a technical gap between 360 and PS3. IT was actually a prediction i made on these forums a few months before (but was instantly labelled a PS3 fanboy for it).


Looks the part, now i wonder if it supports the new Rumbleshock?

I really dont see the gap. The game is a year or more out. And not much better looking than gears of war released 6 months ago!

ill avoid calling you a fanboy this time.

I' m wating to see more levels, hopefully in a brighter location, Typically overly dark games arent my thing.

Small details make the best games...

IVe just watched the 720p trailer which i DL on PS network VIA bright HDMI PS3. It looks clearly alot better than any console game so far. You would be lying to yourself if you thought otherwise.

On a flip, i also D/l' d and watched the MG4 trailer, while it looked good, it was not mindblowing, even suffered from alot of framerate issues.

seems like people still want to hate on the game, is it the platform it' s on?

Please...

The first game was scored around 75% in avg.
Now the game has been hyped throguh the roof for 2 years just because of a CGI trailer.

Now that is ***ing bizzare.
That a 75% game can be hyped up from nothing just because of a CGI.

If the first game had deliver then I could have understand the hype,but it didn' t.

Yes the game is really good looking but it may be the same crap game as killzone was.

ps! Yes I had and liked Killzone on the ps2 but if someon here think halo is overhyped would have spit on that title then... because it was a little better then the avg shooter.