Actually a nominations based system could work much better. It' s an issue of time. Can you guys propose a system that might work for this? That couldn' t be abused either preferably.

People should be nominate others, the 5-10 top peoples names goes into a poll an we all vote for the top ones for each month...maybe

that sounds like alot of work. Why dont we all just send them to me, i have a vote, I nominate myself, I accept, ....Its great to have power.

Howsabout this. Anybody levels 4 & 5 can vote, then Adam can take our suggestions & start shipping games. Simple, elegant, and keeps it fairly objective.

If nobody' s got better ideas, then my votes are as follows:

Tiz
Ghost
Ginjirou

People below a certain level shouldn' t be able to win. Level 3 or above sounds good to me, ...and people who have left shouldn' t be able to win.

Can people only win once, because VX deserves to win again!

The month thing should only be a " we do this every 6 months and now need 6 winners" thing rather than people winning for specific months. It' d only work that way if it was done every month.

Anyway, these guys are definitely deserving of being a Kikizo Winner:

Byakko
uumai
Eddie the Hated
Tiz
mastachefbkw
Evil Man
Agent Ghost
locopuyo
choupolo
f3hunter
Bishonen

Nobody likes me

Oh, we like you. But your level is too low.
Believe me, if you would' ve had level 3 or above you' d be the first member on our minds.

Ok, I need to think, maybe we should need a definate list of voters? and all vote at once [or around the same period of days]

Oh, we like you. But your level is too low.
Believe me, if you would' ve had level 3 or above you' d be the first member on our minds.

Yeah right Thanks for trying to make me feel better anyway.

Who says we even have a say? We don' t have any say until the people with power give us power. I' ve yet to see this happen. Besides I like how Adam or whichever mythical being is in charge chooses the lucky whoever. They read every post since the last winners were chosen which is more than any of us do.

If the winners are choosen by the members it almost turns everything into a popularity contest. The problem with this is that members like Calintz get overlooked.

ORIGINAL: Agent Ghost

Who says we even have a say? We don' t have any say until the people with power give us power. I' ve yet to see this happen. Besides I like how Adam or whichever mythical being is in charge chooses the lucky whoever. They read every post since the last winners were chosen which is more than any of us do.

If the winners are choosen by the members it almost turns everything into a popularity contest. The problem with this is that members like Calintz get overlooked.

Erm...

ORIGINAL: Adam Doree

Actually a nominations based system could work much better. It' s an issue of time. Can you guys propose a system that might work for this? That couldn' t be abused either preferably.

...

hmm, nevermind then.

I still think sending all the games to me is a good idea.

The easiest way would be a poll, where you can' t vote twice, but i' m quite sure it can be abused. And it doesn' t really allow for removal of votes by people under a certain level.

hmm... Well I certainly know nothing about the best ways to do it... i' ll just be over here in my corner

Now this may or may not be the logic of a drunk (this time of year the only thing I drink is coffee and whisky, Christmas through New Years). Ok now I' m a little fucked but it seems to me the best way to do things is to each (or whoever is interested) give their x number of favorites based on how many months is due. I' m way passed the point where I can count, but lets say there are 9 months to cover for this generous game giveaway. Then anyone who wants to vote nominates 9 people. The 9 people with the most votes wins.

Note: I used 9 as an example, I don' t know how many months equal the amount of games to be given out. Also, I don' t know when the Gods of Kikizo want to send out these gifts of gaming or when you guys want these results but between now and jan 3rdish I intend to be too drunk to give my nominations. Sorry but I' m too *looks up spelling of* incapacitated to recall enough to make any of the fore mentioned. Oh, and you can' t vote for yourself. That would be too cheap and void of any greatness* (I can' t think of a better word to put here).

Ok, so my next endeavor* (I had to google the spelling of that word) is to not pass out on anything sharp. Isn' t this fun? I' m having fun...goodnight.

Well, we should probably decide on a course of action soon.

All in favor of having levels 4-5 vote?

I really don' t care. We might as well have a lottery

No,no fucking vote,then i would lose you retards,lets do like a lottery way ffs.

we' re not doing a stupid lottery...

Ok, let' s take each other on in some online game.
Gears of War or Counter-Strike or whatever.
The six best players gets the games.
And next time we change to another game so the same persons won' t win.
Too bad there aren' t any online games that EVERYONE has...

And even then ginjirou with the small case g, We all live in different country' s [mostly] so the timezones and playing times would be all screwed up.