Forum Navigation
Welcome to Kikizo's Forum Archives. Login and user functionality is no longer available -- this is now a permanent archive of forum content.

Prev Thread Prev Thread   Next Thread Next Thread
 28 weeks / days / months later!?
Author Message
Ikashiru

  • Total Posts : 649
  • Joined: May 27, 2005
28 weeks / days / months later!? - Jul 26, 2006 20:09
Weill I for one quite liked the original, it was pretty cliche, but had some outstanding cinematography, of particular note was early morning filming making london city centre look empty.

Now they are bringing out a sequel, and Alex Garland (chap who wrote the original, now rumoured to be unused Halo Script) is producing it.

What do people think of this? Now the Americans have come to open Britain up again and something goes wrong... hmmmmn I' m unconvinced it' s going to be any good.
Nitro

  • Total Posts : 11960
  • Joined: Dec 30, 2005
RE: 28 weeks / days / months later!? - Jul 26, 2006 20:35
Is Danny Boyle directing?!
Ikashiru

  • Total Posts : 649
  • Joined: May 27, 2005
RE: 28 weeks / days / months later!? - Jul 26, 2006 20:46
He is down as a producer at the moment with Juan Carlos Fresnadillo as the director but this hasn' t been set in stone yet.
nekkid_monkey

  • Total Posts : 818
  • Joined: Feb 05, 2006
RE: 28 weeks / days / months later!? - Jul 27, 2006 00:15
Same people involved, so the quality should stay the same i would think.


That said, I really didn' t think anything special about the movie. I' m not into zombies..they just don' t intrigue me. They' re boring.
I guess I just don' t feel the drama I' m supposed to feel over seeing a dead/diseased person walking around. Something about it just doesn' t scare me. Plus I' m not really big on carnage. I like my horror supernatural.

I realize that' s all personal preference though. When I saw the movie in the theater I could understand why zombie movie lovers would like it. It was a well made movie.
Xtreme

  • Total Posts : 272
  • Joined: May 07, 2004
RE: 28 weeks / days / months later!? - Jul 27, 2006 05:57
The first one was a decent ride, but I think they should have left it at that.
Silentbomber

  • Total Posts : 4673
  • Joined: Dec 17, 2004
RE: 28 weeks / days / months later!? - Jul 27, 2006 07:56
I thought the film needed more gun obessed gi joe' s. And a black guy who was the first one to die.

its called 28 Months Later.


Anybody see the alternate ending version? what was that about?, I hate alternate endings.
locopuyo

  • Total Posts : 3138
  • Joined: Jan 10, 2005
  • Location: Minneapolis
RE: 28 weeks / days / months later!? - Jul 27, 2006 12:07
I think I saw it but I' m not sure. I don' t think it was in actual movie form just some guys describing it with a few drawings. Kinda stupid IMO. They find some locked room and they say there is a way they can save the girl' s dad. If the main guy in the movie does some wierd blood transfer or something and sacrifices himself so the dad can be a normal human. He does it and that is how the movie ends. If it ended like that I would have thought the movie sucked. I liked the movie, definetly not one of my favorites because I don' t like scary movies, but I thought it was good.

Jump to:

Icon Legend and Permission
  • New Messages
  • No New Messages
  • Hot Topic w/ New Messages
  • Hot Topic w/o New Messages
  • Locked w/ New Messages
  • Locked w/o New Messages
  • Read Message
  • Post New Thread
  • Reply to message
  • Post New Poll
  • Submit Vote
  • Post reward post
  • Delete my own posts
  • Delete my own threads
  • Rate post