Forum Navigation
Welcome to Kikizo's Forum Archives. Login and user functionality is no longer available -- this is now a permanent archive of forum content.

Prev Thread Prev Thread   Next Thread Next Thread
 Crysis is NOT well optimized in directx10 , proof.
Author Message
Abasoufiane

  • Total Posts : 2127
  • Joined: Sep 14, 2005
Crysis is NOT well optimized in directx10 , proof. - Aug 24, 2008 17:42
I finaly finished Crysis, i'm not going to you how i liked it, i am so mad at you dumb asses that none of you mentioned this to me before playing this game!
"1. In folder BIN find two files, CryRenderD3D9.dll and CryRenderD3D10.dll
2. Switch their names
3. Then create a shortcut to the file Crysis.exe
4. Go to the shortcut's properties and add -DX10 (write without quotes) at the end of the target line
5. Or, if paragraph 4 failed, then write DX10
6. Also possible option without space, it all depends on the version
"
Nitro, virtua and to all who played crysis in this forum, this is gold yet none of you have talked about it, forget about those config files, this enables you to play crysis in directx9 mode while keeping all the features of directx 10 in VISTA, yes i didn't used it in XP but vista64, the difference is of course performance.  this shows that directx10 is so fucked up somehow or that cryteck did something very wrong. i can gain between 15% to 30% depending on the scene with NO DIFFERENCE IN QUALITY ! i have some pics for you to see:
 
This is Directx10 mode

[img=http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/2433/crysis64200808241657272ju2.th.jpg]
[img=http://img161.imageshack.us/img161/9880/crysis64200808241707141os3.th.jpg]
[img=http://img58.imageshack.us/img58/556/crysis64200808241803140ut7.th.jpg]

This is Directx9 mode

[img=http://img246.imageshack.us/img246/7743/crysis64200808241659358ny5.th.jpg]
[img=http://img161.imageshack.us/img161/5793/crysis64200808241709259kk1.th.jpg]
[img=http://img380.imageshack.us/img380/6959/crysis64200808241805497pv5.th.jpg]
 
Here is what i found out as well, if you activate AAx2 in directx9 mode, it will take a huge hit, enough to make it equal to directx10 X2aa. interesting ? why would that happen exactly? some educated thought ?
Neverthless, this shows that something is seriously fucked up between crytech and microsoft, and i'm really disapointed because i could have played this game way better, specialy by the end when it was sometimes freaking un playable in that cruiser. this is the driving force why i did all this research, i thought that a 4870 SHOULD run this game  at ease, this card is at least twice powerful as a ps3 if not three times in some cases, all the other games prove that, with so much ram and quad overclocked to 3ghz it failed to achieve even 25 fps in many segments of the game (all very high),  crytech should review its code and i bet that far cry 2 will run much much better. too bad i found oout about directx9 mode way too late.
********
on another note, if you play Call of duty 4 on pc,  enable DUAL GPU,  it will improve your FPS even you have one card , see that for yourself. yeah one of those weird things again.
<message edited by Abasoufiane on Aug 24, 2008 18:28>

Jump to:

Icon Legend and Permission
  • New Messages
  • No New Messages
  • Hot Topic w/ New Messages
  • Hot Topic w/o New Messages
  • Locked w/ New Messages
  • Locked w/o New Messages
  • Read Message
  • Post New Thread
  • Reply to message
  • Post New Poll
  • Submit Vote
  • Post reward post
  • Delete my own posts
  • Delete my own threads
  • Rate post