* IGN- 9.7/10
* GamesRadar US – 10/10
* GameInformer US – 10/10, segunda opinión 10/10
* EGM – 10/10, segunda opinión 10/10, tercera opinión10/10
* GamePro – 10/10
* 1UP – 10/10
* OXM – 10/10
* X360 Gamer – 10/10
* X360 – 10/10
* PC Zone – 96%
* PC Gamer – 95%
* Xbox World – 94%
* EuroGamer – 10/10
* Official Xbox Magazine – 10/10
* PC Powerplay – 10/10
* Game Arena – 5/5
* Hyper – 97%
* 360 Live – 9.8/10

Oh btw avg ratio from 1up readers is so far 4.7/10
And here I claimed only sonyfanboys hang at 1up,I were so wrong right?

how the hell those readers review a game they didn' t even play, they always do it always, stupid people , not only they put a very low score but some put 0 , what they are thinking and what' s their benefit from acting like that?? yes some people are alreadsy playing the full version but this is a minority... anyway thjose people are so full of crap.

Wouldn' t it make sense to keep our Bioshock-gasms to one thread?

YEah right like people would think it would be enough with one Blue dragon thread too,pffff.

You' ve made your point.

Does Bioshock have multiplayer?

No, it doesn' t have. A real masterpiece doesn' t need a multiplayer mode. Did Super Mario 64 have one? Did OoT have one?

Did the N64 have a modem?

Holy smokes, those are incredible review scores. I think I' ll play this after all... but I' m probably going to wait a couple of months so I can see what my workload is like when school starts back up.

ORIGINAL: Eddie_the_Hated

Did the N64 have a modem?

64DD had one ;)

http://www.sonydefenseforce.com/?p=83

Sony site review Bioshock gives it 5/10.-

Why is there a website called Sony Defense Force? Is it really necessary?

that' s no sony site and has nothing whatsoever professional , this is a fanboy site , clear like a sun, you should make a difference , but reading some comments and that review made me laugh.

Yeah,we should ignore that site,but ABA if gamerankings add it,then Gamerankings.com needs to shut down.

Oh btw avg ratio from 1up readers is so far 4.7/10

That' s pretty low.

Metacritic and Game Rankings already do this more efficiently, albeit without the smooth commentary from Quezcatol.

" I also wonder how much better the graphics would’ve been had they not been compressed to fit on a DVD. Now I do not fault the developers for this, they only had so much system power to work with so maybe this will all be addressed with the PS3 version when it comes out."


http://www.sonydefenseforce.com/?p=83


LOL this guy is a fucking comedian.

" I also wonder how much better the graphics would’ve been had they not been compressed to fit on a DVD

Thats pretty funny. Especially since last time I checked the 360 had a better graphics card

He' s talking about the ability to display uncompressed textures in a game, it has more to do with storage space than how badass your GPU is.

Uncompressed textures are rather big, so they compress them to make them fit on a DVD. There' s loss of image quality when you compress an image, therefore a compressed texture in a game will look worse than an uncompressed one.

Now, in theory, adding Blu-Ray to the PS3 meant that with so much space available, audio and textures didn' t have to be compressed, so they should look better. However what the idiot at Sony Defense Force fails to realize is that the PS3 suffers from a memory bottleneck, and while they might be able to store all of that uncompressed data, displaying it is an entirely different ball-game.

Eddie is way wrong,you wanna compress files because not only does it take less space but it makes the files load faster to.

You cant compare compression with JEPG format Eddie ,its nothing like it.