Yeah, that was the funny part.
Changing around somebodies last name is now freaking hilarious? I guess I' m missing your sophisticated humor.
My penis can rope a dope.
That does wonders for your serious image.
It could just be that Sony is charging more, but it' s impossible to state that with such clarity. The complexity of the situation trumps fanboyism.
Fanboyism?
--->I' m a PSP hater am I?<---
Unless you' ve been living under a rock or have been in a coma for the past six months then you know that Sony is going through troubled times.
I know people who don' t know what the fuck they are talking about state opinions on the current climate of video games all the goddamn time, but they are typically too stupid to locate their own asshole with tp.
You' re avoiding the bulk of that paragraph.
Tell me with any sort of conviction that Sony isn' t going through a pretty rough spot right now. I' m not speaking about the industry as a whole, generalisations are useless in this regard, but Sony is in trouble if they don' t get their act together.
A. Anything that has to do with the PS3 is irrelevant when discussing the PSP.
Wrong, if Sony tanks in one department, they' ll go downhill in another. Sega anybody?
B. Very small market share in the handheld market is stupidity.
What???
If you weren' t stupid, you' d understand that Sony has the largest market share that a handheld competitor to Nintendo has ever had, and it' s significant (20%+).
So I' m stupid? You' re the guy that just insisted that a small market share is stupidity.
. But you' re correct, PSP does have the largest Nintendo-competitor market share. What the hell has Nintendo had in the way of competition in the past 10 years? Buckets of companies who didn' t already have their foot in the door, that' s what. N-Gage? Gizmondo? Neo-Geo? All on the same playing field as Nintendo I' m sure.
Sony ripped Nintendo a new one in the household industry for 2 generations before the PSP. By the release of the PSP Sony had a serious upper hand in market share for over
10 years. They had very few of the problems common amongst other handheld contenders.
As a side note, I' d appreciate it if you kept the personal insults to a minimum, I have done so, so it' d only be natural to expect the same from you.
A person who buys A does not abstain from buying B in every instance. Furthermore, you do NOT have any numbers indicating sore financial straits for Sony on the PSP. Therefore, if you say Sony is doing poorly you are speaking out of your asshole. NDS' s success does NOT mean PSP' s lack of success. That' s not how it works, that' s only how fanboy minds work.
The minute somebody doesn' t agree with you they' re branded a fanboy? Is that how that works now? Got news for ya' buddy, I' m not speaking out of my asshole today. Acording to
Chart-Track (independent), Nintendo DS has 68% of the market in their pocket. Using common deduction, one can
clearly see that not a small handful, but
many people chose " product A" over " product B" . Smooth talk your way around hard-numbers why don' t you?
You said nothing to indicate you had any factual knowledge about anything. No numbers mean you are speaking out of turn.
No numbers means I assume you have the same base knowlege that I do. While not technically in the red (to the best of my knowlege at any rate), it shows that Sony is having some sort of financial issues. Don' t even ask me to link the " ridiculous PS3 development cost" articles to you. That much I' m assuming you can figure out without another citation.
On that note though, I don' t see any numbers OR references supporting your side of the debate. Talk to me once you' ve got facts to back up your poor excuse for witty dialogue.
Furthermore, his fanboyism is even more disgusting than any immaturity I may have.
Show me one article written by him that verbally insults anybody, or for that matter shows as much supposed " blatant bias" as this one.
Immaturity isn' t disgusting, it' s a poor reflection on your ability to carry on an intelligent debate. It proves to me that the only way you can adequately support your position is by threading belittling insults & jibes into your opinions.
How does that translate to a " hardcore" game?
Quite simply in fact. Lets take for example another equally high-rated Mario game. Mario 64 could be regarded as a very childish game. There' s no curbstomping or headshots or swearing or fornicating with prostitutes in the back of sedans, but hardcore gamers embrace it as one of the best examples of modern gaming ever. The casual gamer will fall in love with a 7.0 game, but the hardcore want something amazing. And if over 2 million copies of a game are sold, one can logically conclude that quite a few hardcore gamers thought it was " amazing" .
It' s almost like you' re appealing to the fanboy collective on the forums by associating me with past posters that were disliked and then acting like you said something intelligent.
But screwing up Alex' s name is hilarious? If you' d like, I' ll gladly edit that particular portion out of my post. Also, who is the fanboy collective? This forum gets more Microsoft Fanboy hateposts than Nintendo for sure. Ask anybody not currently involved in this cult you call " the fanboy collective" , they' ll set the record straight.
Well, that' s good. Kikizo has some of the shittiest reporting I' ve ever seen.
Nobody asked you what you thought of the article. Why take it so personally? You' re calling me a Nintendo fanboy here, but everybody on the forums can attest to the fact that I' ve been quite critical of Nintendo as of late, more so than Sony.