Quake Wars gameplay screens!

I' m guessing the settings aren' t maxed out...

I suspect UT3 and Huxley will stomp all over this

I was hoping for better than that, like you hoping UT2007 or whatever they are going to call it is better.

Unreal 3 WILL stomp all over this! Quake 4 has put me off Quake....

" I suspect UT3 and Huxley will stomp all over this"

I' m not sure Huxly is a fair comparison with this. Huxley is an MMO that will probably have monthly fees. Unless you were only speaking in terms of graphics.

Unless you were only speaking in terms of graphics.

He was.

And as much as I love id/Quake, Epic/Unreal Technology are crushing them graphically, and gameplay wise too (Gears vs Quake 4). I pine for the days of Quake 3' s greatness.

I dont want to celebrate, I want to sell you hate.

Quake 4 was only average because ID left the game to Raven Games to Develop..

Quake Wars is done by ID and it will kick Major Ass.


Edit:

ID have been working on this game for soo long now and from the lastest game tests at Quakecon, the gameplay is ALL there. ID style.


Then again, i forgot most of this generation of gamers judge games on screenshots.

f3 sometimes you talk the biggest load of bollocks around, this generation only judge games by screenshots, you great fucking numpty.

ORIGINAL: f3hunter

Quake 4 was only average because ID left the game to Raven Games to Develop..

Quake Wars is done by ID and it will kick Major Ass.


Edit:

ID have been working on this game for soo long now and from the lastest game tests at Quakecon, the gameplay is ALL there. ID style.


Then again, i forgot most of this generation of gamers judge games on screenshots.

No, Splash Damage are making the PC version of Quake Wars. Only the MegaTexture technology was developed by id (and it' s id, not ID) Software.

Nerve Software are handling the 360 version, and Z-Axis the PS3 version.

A) you' re an idiot, and B) i would have thought that being ' Mr PC Fanboy of the Year 200X' you' d know who was developing the game...

f3 is a moron.

ORIGINAL: Evil Man

f3 is a moron.

Yes he is.

I don' t do personal attacks behind a computer screen.

Lets go with the crowd:



Ergh look at it, this game is going to suck!

It' s... wow... uhhh... an amazing Xbox game? That' s really disappointing, they' d better clean that stuff up.

ORIGINAL: f3hunter

I don' t do personal attacks behind a computer screen.

Lets go with the crowd:



Ergh look at it, this game is going to suck!

If I wanted to play last gen games I' d get a Wii, you stupid fuck.

f3 sometimes you talk the biggest load of bollocks around, this generation only judge games by screenshots,.

Sorry, my consistant bad english must be annoying, I' m mostly doing one or two things at the same time,...

' sometimes' not even bothering to look at the screen while im typing.

Thanks for the worthless info. I care.

ORIGINAL: f3hunter

f3 sometimes you talk the biggest load of bollocks around, this generation only judge games by screenshots,.

Sorry, my consistant bad english must be annoying, I' m mostly doing one or two things at the same time,...

' sometimes' not even bothering to look at the screen while im typing.

I think you' re misunderstanding his post actually.

f3 is a moron.

Thank you captain obvious

So is this game bringing anything new to the table cause if it looks like that then um what and the hell is the selling point?

So is this game bringing anything new to the table cause if it looks like that then um what and the hell is the selling point?

The selling point is the fact that there are Quake nerds that will undoubtedly buy it. I' m not a graphics whore, but when there are already much better looking games with great multiplayer, they really need to step it up gameplay wise.

Quake, Quake II & Quake III (especially) were awesome.

Quake IV was pathetic, but as f3 pointed out that' s because Raven handled it and not id. Doom 3, which was handled by id was far far far better than Quake IV could ever hope to be. I even stand by my claims that it' s technically more proficient, even though it preceded Quake IV.

Quake Wars hold promise, and i' d rather Splash Damage handled it than Raven, but i' d much prefer it if id was handling it.

What they should have done is build upon Quake III, rather than go the Battlefield route. But then Epic pulled it off with UT2004 so i' ll give Quake Wars the benefit of the doubt. But i must say that everything i' ve seen so far hasn' t really impressed, and that' s not a good thing when UT3 looks so good and there' s another Battlefield game in the works. I can see Quake Wars getting left behind.

But meh, what has me intrigued is id' s new IP that nobody knows about yet. id are are still on of the best developers going, i just don' t like there insistence on outsourcing development of their older IP' s to sub-standard studios.

But meh, what has me intrigued is id' s new IP that nobody knows about yet. id are are still on of the best developers going, i just don' t like there insistence on outsourcing development of their older IP' s to sub-standard studios.

The reason for the outsourcings is id is a small company, but according to what I' ve heard, splash damage and Nerve are much more competent than Raven. Never heard of Z-Axis. But Im confident with the ease of PC to 360 that the port should be decent, but then again look at Prey and Quake 4.

I dont want to celebrate, I want to sell you hate.