Y' know you can be objective to Quez without pissing him off... In actual fact
you can be objective to ANYONE without pissing them off, it' s all to do with the
way things are worded..
Blue Dragon looks great and compelling, you can' t argue with that, but then it' s
not really for me, I' m not a big JRPG fan, but if one does come along and the
story/characters interest me and have enough drive, i' ll buy it, and try it out
and then if I feel that the turn-based aspect isn' t too exciting, i' ll hand it to one
of my brothers to complete and play whilst I watch the story go by!
This whole screenshot bollocks is irritating, screens look like cack REGARDLESS
of the resolution, compared to their full-motion counterparts. If we ARE
going to look at screens, can we at least give them the benefit of a doubt.
Does that screenshot represent the quality of the game or is this one of those few bad screens every game has that never should be shown?
Given that this^^^ was innocently provocative, I think Ginj knew what he was
doing here... Although he should have really known that no-one here has
experienced Blue Dragon " in-game" for themselves, so how are we exactly
to know what the experience feels like?
On the flipside, Quez, you already know that BD doesn' t look like that in more
recent shots, as I am pretty sure that, that shot is fairly old now, you' ve
even seen the playable intro as well - which is more than enough confirmation
that the games graphics do not suck that bad, if Ginj is left with the impression
that BD' s graphics are like that, let it be, or objectively provide him with a screen
closer to the actual quality of the completed game.
We don' t really need more people " pulling a ]GaNgStA[" in this forum and
leaving because of the heat he/she receives from another forum member..
Don' t you quit on me Ginj!