And seeing VF5 in the flesh.. now thats what i call ' Gorgeous'
Even Table Tennis looks better than GoW in my opinion. But try to make table tennis with enviorment' s like in Gow and character that are more than 1+1. Still, as being another one of the few I always feel it' s my responsibility to point out the not so great parts of Gears. I don' t think it' s the best 3rd person action ever and I was honestly more impressed with Max Payne, back in the days. Also, I hadn' t played RE4 until recently (after GoW) and I found that one as well as more impressive than GoW.
And I also don' t think that it would' ve been so well recieved, if it wasn' t for the pretty graphics, because let' s face it... casual gamers love pretty pictures (heck, even I do! And Note: I' m not saying they should be dissapointed by the gameply, when the game is in their hands) . And by all rights, the graphics are the best, most gorgeous one out there, but still I wasn' t impressed. Not because it isn' t beautiful, rather because this is what I had expected of the 360. Also, I can' t help but get distracted by Crysis (eve though it' s lightyears away).
Gears of War isn' t perfect if you' d ask me. There are far to many things I miss in it, to make me crown it as such. But the things that are in the game ARE well made (with the exception of the veichle part). But this is only one ants opinion, and all the other ants in the farm think otherwise. And it' s their rights as ants to do so.
Gears of War is the perfect example of the graphical superiority that western developers constantly achieve over their Japanese counterparts.
Depends on how you mean. In terms of technology and right now, then Gears is probably superior. But thinking of artistry (though that can' t really be rated) and previous generations (technologically), then I believe the Japanese excels.
Edit:
Btw: i think Motorstorm " looks" good, but I don' t really need a racer/rally game, other than Mario Kart
< Message edited by Dionysius -- 28 Nov 06 15:19:30 >