ORIGINAL: QuezcatoL
HAHAHHAAHAHHAAHAHa
SUX TO OWN A PS3 NOW DOESNT IT?!
Comments like this confuse me.
Is it simply fanboy talk? Perhaps it' s just to annoy the extreme sony fanboys here at kikizo? Because from some members who claim, " It' s all about the games" or " I don' t care about the consoles just the games" it seems strange to be insulting a machine for having worse ports (One that is earlier in it' s life cycle, i might add).
I wish you' d all grow up, sony fanboys, microsoft fanboys, it' s old, Get over it.
As for the original post:
" (Generally speaking)When you see the 360 version and you see the PS3 right next to it and 360 is by and large looking better." - Matt C
I would imagine this down to development time with ps3 (it is harder to program for after all). and likely made for 360 and ported to ps3.
" (Marvel Alliance) is running in 1080P on the PS3 which is cool but it was also running much slower, the framerate was not nearly as nice." - Matt C
They still have time to work that out, however that' s sony' s fault for pushing 1080p especially so early in the machines life. I' d rather have like microsoft do, 720p and make it as good as it can be, rather than sacrifice for 1080 that i' ll not likely use.
" (PS3) may not have a very strong line up...but you can go back and play a great majority of the PS1 and PS2 games.." Jeremy Dunham from PS3 IGN
True, i guess. Sony though still havent mention what the ps3 will do with the older games. Also some people i know don' t like going back to play old games once he got a 360... I' d imagine its a widely thought thing for most games