Microsoft guarantees Xbox 360 games will looks better tham PS3 games

http://www.xboxic.com/news/1728

A pretty bold statement...

FLAME WAR!!!!!



Just joking, play nice boys...

There are two rules to success:

1. Never tell all you know.

Wait.... He IS Microsofts version of Kutaragi... Who let that mole in?

There are two rules to success:

1. Never tell all you know.

I donno who he is, but i think he' s drunk.

Its partly true, but its so soon to tell!

FLAME WAR!!!!

Even if you break 2 legs from a crab it still runs!
What you gotta do is find its weak spot and do massive damage at it.

What the hell is this?
http://www.sonydefenseforce.com/

ORIGINAL: ginjirou

What the hell is this?
http://www.sonydefenseforce.com/

Some bullshit thing started at GAF. Those guys are the saddest people over there.

XBL Gamertag: Rampage99

" Basically, pollute the air all you want, your just speeding up the inevitable. Our future generations are f*cked as it is and there' s really nothing we can do about it. Have a nice day "

Wow, isn' t two Kens a bit too much?

I seriously don' t believe that the visual gap this Gen will be the same as the old one was between the PS2 and the XBox. It' s preety much the same i think, what' s being done in the 360 is feasible on the PS3 and vice-versa

except for HDR + AA

"If you knew how good I am you would think I'm modest."

Wow, isn' t two Kens a bit too much?

I seriously don' t believe that the visual gap this Gen will be the same as the old one was between the PS2 and the XBox. It' s preety much the same i think, what' s being done in the 360 is feasible on the PS3 and vice-versa

Yeah two is a bit much ;)

The Xbox 360 will be showing better graphics this next year, its been out longer, and the tools are familiar to the developers, where as the developers have been worried about the tools given along with the devkits for the PS3 (except the biased second hand developers)

Its going to be an interesting gen, to see what Sony can do with Cell combined with the underpowered RSX. And what MS can do with their ATI gpu with the unified memory.

Not only interesting, but also healthy for the Industry. Sony has been on the Top for too much time. Don' t get me wrong i have been a Sony fan since the old Playstation days but no one is really pushing them to Develop great things, remember how awesome most of us thought the PS was when it came out?


It' s not so healthy for the wallet though...

I' m not a dev i have no idea,but upcoming 2nd gen xbox360 games looks better then first gen ps3 games.

Even if you break 2 legs from a crab it still runs!
What you gotta do is find its weak spot and do massive damage at it.

Yeah two is a bit much ;)

360 games are naturally going to look better now, if only because it' s been out longer, and developers have had a chance to work with it. I' ve said it before, I think it' s going to be a few years before the curve really comes around, but when it does, I think the ps3 is going to outstrip the 360 in terms of visuals. I' m not saying PS3 is going to be a sucess, but like the PS2 and PS1, launch titles and AAA fourth year titles are completely different in terms of visuals.

ORIGINAL: locopuyo

except for HDR + AA

You mean HDR + FSAA + VSYNC -- which 360 can do and PS3 can' t.

Hey... The PS3 can lie....
...
.....
....

ALL BY ITSELF!

There are two rules to success:

1. Never tell all you know.

Kojima isn' t really developing Mgs4,its the blu-ray :P

Even if you break 2 legs from a crab it still runs!
What you gotta do is find its weak spot and do massive damage at it.

Seriously though, i keep telling people not to listen to biased parties. Microsoft are obviously going to say 360 will have better visuals for the next two years of whatever, it' s just idiot talk.

Yes, the best looking 360 games will look nicer than the best looking PS3 games because 360' s GPU is more advanced than, and can do more than PS3' s. BUT, Microsoft has no quality control (though neither has Sony) and so there will also be a lot of sh!t looking games on both consoles.

The one thing that they won' t go near is things like framerates and physics. Sure 360 games might look nicer, but if a 360 game looks slightly nicer than a PS3 game, but that PS3 game runs at a constant 60fps whereas the 360 game runs at 30+ but not quite 60fps, which game is better?!

This kind of comment from either company should be ignored.

But Ken Kutaragi promised us 120 framerate games.!!!!!

Even if you break 2 legs from a crab it still runs!
What you gotta do is find its weak spot and do massive damage at it.

But Ken Kutaragi promised us 120 framerate games.!!!!!

Uhhhh i remember th that

What' s the point of 120 first person shooters per second??? That honour
belongs to the 360!!

Oh, you meant 120 frames per second..

Well, the human eye can' t register anything above..... 75 was it?

There are two rules to success:

1. Never tell all you know.

actually the human eye is around 25 or so, but it works in a different way


(i might be wrong, but i like sounding smart)

teh xbox360 cn do 54709 frames per second at 1080p on 25 montirz simultanepusly omg and pS3 is so ghey it cn only do 120 frames per second, cure cancer and work with 2 1080p monitors it is gay and sucks

IF YOU GUYS SAY ANYMORE OF THAT BS " OMGZ TEH HUMAN EYEZ CAN" T GO ABOVE 20 FPS" I" M GONNA FXING SLIT YOUR THROATZ.

we had this debate a million times and everytime it was proven the human eye can detect way beyond 60. So pleeeeeeeeeaseeeeeeeeeee STFU before I cut u.

"If you knew how good I am you would think I'm modest."

So pleeeeeeeeeaseeeeeeeeeee STFU before I cut u.

Dude you' re getting as funny as Quez!