i' m sure that either me or you are total lunatic...
let' s just be precise, are u talking about dreamcast vs first year ps2 ?? or dreamcast vs ps2 simple ?,
if it' s the first i would definitly agree, dreamcast was beter than ps2, but after that ps2 picked up result DC ====> dead
i don' t care if it' s sony' s fucking money, or hyping or just name it, the thing is very good games were and are on ps2 today, coparing the whole console life to DC life is pure bullshit.
Not quite true but Shenmue walks over every RPG anyway!
i swear i wonder sometimes if soem people are on crack here when they write stuff on this forum.
first of all shenmue is not a RPG it' s an advenure game, we know what' s RPG is, at least we gamers know what rpg is, you can argue with me but that' s your problem.
please, when you talk about rpg' s, be sure to mention skies of arcadia or at least grandia 2 which are the best rpg' s i can consider on that console , any otehr rpg on dreamcast is CRAP.
shenmue 2 is not a masterpiece , may be for you but for teh industry hell no, that game got so many fluctuations in its score, many poeple loved it, many people thought it' s average, and some even thought it was boring... we conclude then that it' s not an AAA
hey nobody can say Gran turismo 3 is a bad racing game
nobody can say that devil may cry is a bad action game
nobody can say final fantasy 7 is a bad rpg
nobody can say that virtua fighter is a bad fighting game
nobody say mario 64 is a bad platform game
and nobody would say golden eye or half life 2 is a bad fps
my point is , when there are so many people calling a game boring, bad gameplay , repettive, even if the otehr half think otehrwise, you can' t name that game anymore a masterpiece may be to you , but not to the industry? are we cool?
back to teh subject , ps2 has so many great and much beter rpg' s than DC ever had, i don' t fucking care if some of those games were realsed on the 3rd year or 4th year or second , we' re comparing both consoles in gneral.
The PS2 had its DVD-player but that' s all.
The Dreamcast had the first unified online service, visual memory cards, four controller slots, 60hz option and more.
the ps2 dvd feature is for the market much more important than a stupiud visual memory (yah it' s cool and what ??) and the 4 slots
Dc online didn' t work well , it was too early for this, only very very few games took advantage of it anyway.
almost all recent games (since 2 years ago) give the option of 60 hz, and that problem is only for pal territory anyway ( but not anymore)
quote:
NO GOOD SOCCER GAME in DC !!! ( virtua striker )
Ok... like I give a damn.
see you' re talking about yourself , so next time say DC is the best console ever FOR ME and THE FEW LIKE ME you might add :)
many people including me are interested in soccer game , and the abscence in DC was lethal...
Most of Segas franchises were there. 3rd party companies were bought by Sony. The money choose the PS2, not the quality.
like what ?? euuh sonic 1 which was hmm good the others sucked, then what ecco ? virtua fighter ?
let' s talk about sega 16bit that didn' t make it to teh dreamcast
i wanted shinobie
outrun
street of rage
golden axe
legend of thor
comix zone
let' s talk about the 32 bit era
panzer dragon
castlevania
metal gear
......... infinity that didn' t make it to DC which was a huuuuge disapointement since it was supposed to be a next generation , most of us expected to see these franchises on DC , it never happened even after 3 years
ps2 gamepad is better than DC pad... ginjirou what i really feel about your post is that you just want to contradict me hat' s all , specialy when you pointed out each and every comment of mine , man at least there should be some truth there , what i' m THAT stupid !!!
oh man enough already !! i' m sick this is rediculous comparing ps2 to DC is ridiculous