That' s ALL I do? Ever?
And I know you think my arguments are worth reading otherwise you wouldn' t have spent so much time writing that response (which I only glossed over).
No, I don’t. Hence why I don’t bother trying to refute them. I refuted claims like yours years ago. No use arguing with people whom have no desire to change their minds.
I never said I hate or even dislike DoA.
So I guess that explains the constant negativity you have whenever DOA is mentioned. Not just in this thread, in EVERY thread. You don’t get a pass by saying “I prefer Tekkenâ€, as Tekken is not in every DOA thread, but you are.
I do enjoy playing DoA, but my " easy" comments are mostly based on Itagaki calling anyone who can' t beat Ninja Gaiden a " loser" . If hard games are so great, why does he make DoA so easy in single player mode? Anyway I play through mutliple times, I am just amazed that he limits it to one round in story mode. And I do much prefer Tekken 5. I' m sorry if you can' t handle that.
Sorry, I really don’t care. Your bias, not mines.
The reason I " bring them down" whenever someone speaks positively about DoA in this thread is because those comments are usually directed at me in the first place.
Because you’re usually the first to bash the game. It’s not as if anyone ever starts a DOA thread by saying, “Joe, let me show you how wrong you are…†People respond to your negativity because you’ve given them something to respond too.
Have you not been part of this forum very long? My general writing style is pretty much " tell it like I see it" and it can be pretty abrasive at times to someone who is not familiar with my writing style.
I.E. You can give it but don’t like to take it.
I' m sorry for any tears this may have caused you.
None. I just don’t see a reason to constantly bash a game over and over so viciously. It’s almost as if you have money at stake on DOA.
My response to Auron is a joke. My Itagaki " devil" comment was a joke.
I don’t remember having a problem with your jokes. So what was the point?
As for you, Lotusson, I' m afraid it is you who should be a bit more mature.
Telling someone you’re going to “ignore†them is very disrespectful and childish. I responded in a manner upon which I was replied too. Act immature, get treated immaturely.
You basically call me stupid and a baby. Isn' t it kids who each other call names?
Well, telling someone not to play stupid is different than actually calling them stupid. But yes, baby definitely needs his bottle.
Now I am beginning to know how Fathoms felt for having his opinions persecuted (even though I was guilty for doing that as well). Yes, YOUR posts now have me defending Fathoms.
Fathoms left not because of his opinion, but because he was Fathoms. He had people joining the forums just to bash him, not his opinion.
And if you haven’t realized this by now, I have no problem calling people out, friend or foe. And yes, I’m calling you out. You have a very negative attitude whenever Itagaki/DOA is mentioned, and DOA fans don’t even get a chance freely discuss the game they love.
There’s nothing wrong with voicing your opinion about DOA, but you attack it with such viciousness that all people end up doing is arguing. Sorry, but I don’t see a point.
And as for Fathoms, have we forgotten it wasn’t Fathoms opinion that was persecuted, it was his attitude toward other posters and his blatant bias. He was quick to label people fanboys if they disagreed with him, often mocking their intelligence. And a lot of times he was just flat out wrong. But try and tell him otherwise and you’re the idiot. So it’s no wonder he got so much heat, because his posting style demanded it.
As for this being a DoA thread, I don' t see DoA in the title
Thread titles do not dictate what a thread will eventually become. This thread was not designed to discuss DOA, but because of your comments DOA fans have to defend the game. You very much dictated the path of this thread.
I will only ever say good, positive things in the future just to appease you. No negativity EVER AGAIN! ON ANYTHING! Yay! This forum should be " if you don' t have anything good to say, don' t say it at all" .
Responded to this argument in my last reply. No need to repeat myself.