Who would win 360, PS3, or Revolution

I have been hearing great things about the 360 and how it has a ton of features. The PS3 is gonna be the second best besause the PS3 is gonna enhance graphics and all of that stuff. Sony is only about graphics. The Revolution is only gonna be able to play old and new nintendo games and that sucks. I don' t know about you Revolution fans but this is gonna rip you off. The starting price for these systems are gonn be about 300 each. They should at least bring them down to 250 like the PSP . I personally think that the 360 would be the most likely to win because of Xbox Live all of the time.
Thanks

Um... yeah... um.. mind if I correct you? Or give you my opinions..

Sony isn' t only about graphics. The PS and PS2 were definately overshadowed in terms of graphical performance; in other words, the PS and PS2' s graphics weren' t as great as opposition. Just thought you should know..

" Revolution only plays old and new Nintendo games which sucks."
Huh? Well, with all due respect, that' s totally not right. Revolution plays Revolution games, which will open up amazing new genres, and will attract core, casual, and non-gamers alike with their innovation. You can also download and play 20 years of retro Nintendo games, which has to be pretty darn good. Add that to a revolutionary controller, easy to use technology, simple but existant online play, sleek design, GC playback, and an affordable price make Revolution a great product. I don' t think I' m getting ripped off at all. If ripped off is a question, then how about paying $500 dollars for a supposedly ' dream machine' that boosts development costs, is twice as pricey as another system with similar abilities, and has a banana for a controller. That, in my book, is called ' Rip Off' .

" Revolution only plays old and new Nintendo games which sucks."
I love this quote! Doesn' t PS3 play old and new PS games? And Microsoft too? Oh well...

" Nintendo' s an innovator,
Sony' s an imitator."

Yet, for some reason, it' s Sony that gets all the credit.

Jason, half of what you said hasn' t been proven about the Revolution yet. All you have seen is an empty shell of the console.

Overall the first post of this thread is completely flawed and this topic has been done before.

XBL Gamertag: Rampage99

" Basically, pollute the air all you want, your just speeding up the inevitable. Our future generations are f*cked as it is and there' s really nothing we can do about it. Have a nice day "

I don' t think... so.... *looks at first post*

I guess some of that aren' t complete facts. But I believe them all to be true soon enough though...

I just put down what Nintendo execs touched upon or said. ' Affordable Price' , ' Revolutionary Controller' , ' simple but existant online play' , ' attract new gamers' . They' re just ballparks and premises, but they are true. The specifics are due by the 17th...

" Nintendo' s an innovator,
Sony' s an imitator."

Yet, for some reason, it' s Sony that gets all the credit.

There is no proof behind those statements. You are letting your biase blind you again

XBL Gamertag: Rampage99

" Basically, pollute the air all you want, your just speeding up the inevitable. Our future generations are f*cked as it is and there' s really nothing we can do about it. Have a nice day "

i think the ps3 is gonna be the best.then the revolution.its gonna be great with the cool downloads of classic nintendo games.then the 360.i really dont like the XBoX

<img src=" http://tinypic.com/1ij49v" >