RE: Splinter cell vs. Metal Gear Solid.
-
Dec 19, 2004 23:52
Splinter Cell was a far better when it came to the stealth elements when comparing the two games. I haven' t played MGS3 yet so I' m going off MGS, MGS2, SC, and SC:PT.
Personally I found the Splinter Cell series more enjoyable than the MGS series. Both seies are amazing, don' t get me wrong. I love them both. I just like the added tension of SC. I personally think Sam Fisher is cooler than Snake, and infinately better than Raiden. I also think Michael Ironside' s voice pwns Snake' s. Again, personal opinion.
Story wise I think MGS had the best story. MGS2' s story sucked and that final hour long cinematic was absolute sh*t. Both SC' s stories were far more realistic. I' m more into crazy stories that have insanely cool characters and bad ass art direction, that' s why I liked MGS the best story wise.
Graphics in both SC' s pwn the MGS series. The lighting effects and attention to detail are crazy. I' m in awe every time I play the games. I do like MGS' s style though. The characters designs rule which I think gives it a little edge compared to SC.
In terms of gameplay, I' m by far a SC guy. Splinter cell just owns in that department. With the massive amounts of moves, all the gadgets, and the ability to control the camera it just takes the cake. MGS' s gameplay is fun as hell and offers more shoot outs, but the lack of moves and not being able to control the camera really pissed me off.
It really comes down to personal taste' s though. I love both series, I just like Splinter Cell better. I can already see you two disagree which is completely fine. There is no definative answer to which is better.
On a side not, I can' t f*ckin wait for SC3! Have you guys seen the trailers and screens for this beast?! *drools like a water fall*
XBL Gamertag: Rampage99
" Basically, pollute the air all you want, your just speeding up the inevitable. Our future generations are f*cked as it is and there' s really nothing we can do about it. Have a nice day

"