Edwin
-
Total Posts
:
658
-
Reward points
:
6855
- Joined: Sep 20, 2008
|
BioShock 2 Review
-
Feb 12, 2010 19:15
|
|
Joe Redifer
-
Total Posts
:
4481
-
Reward points
:
43145
- Joined: May 24, 2004
- Location: Denver, CO
|
Re:BioShock 2 Review
-
Feb 13, 2010 01:45
I didn't care for the first because generally I am not a fan of the FPS genre and the first one made me motion sick (most FPS do not). But, on a lighter note:
|
|
Edwin
-
Total Posts
:
658
-
Reward points
:
6855
- Joined: Sep 20, 2008
|
Re:BioShock 2 Review
-
Feb 13, 2010 01:57
Oh my god, my eyes have been opened :D
|
|
mastachefbkw
-
Total Posts
:
3793
-
Reward points
:
13680
- Joined: Jul 11, 2006
|
Re:BioShock 2 Review
-
Feb 13, 2010 04:01
Just for the record, this picture has made my day. It even gave me a reason to backtrack my memory to remember my old log-in. So, liveliness of Kikizo = ????
|
|
Edwin
-
Total Posts
:
658
-
Reward points
:
6855
- Joined: Sep 20, 2008
|
Re:BioShock 2 Review
-
Feb 13, 2010 11:04
|
|
emofag
-
Total Posts
:
1508
-
Reward points
:
20330
- Joined: Apr 01, 2007
|
Re:BioShock 2 Review
-
Feb 14, 2010 08:30
The game is way too similiar to the first, the engine is practically identical and the environments feel like you've seen it all before. There are some nice changes like being able to use plasmids and weapons at the same time, but overall the series needs a new setting, rapture has gotten old.
|
|
Joe Redifer
-
Total Posts
:
4481
-
Reward points
:
43145
- Joined: May 24, 2004
- Location: Denver, CO
|
Re:BioShock 2 Review
-
Feb 14, 2010 16:30
I wonder if they made the PS3 version a little better than part one. I remember it being a bit lower-res than the 360 version. There's no excuse for this, this time.
|
|