You have a twisted definition of what "pretty" is.
That actually looks like shit.
And it doesn't matter what resolution you play PC games at, the resolution isn't what makes them look good. The problem with this picture isn't the resolution, or it's potential framerate, the problem is that it looks like shit. It's simple really. It would still look like shit at 1 million x 1 million pixels and 10 billion frames per second.
Screen resolution has nothing to do with how good a game looks, if you take 640x480 pictures of Crysis and 1920x1200 pictures of Quake II, Crysis still looks 100 times better, dumb shit.
Furthermore, your 360/PC comparison are asinine. 360 costs $200, my videocard alone costs $600, my PC better well produce better graphics. Wii is $250 and has worse graphics than a $50 Xbox 1, that's the problem. Nobody would care or expect much out of Wii's shitty graphics if it cost $25-$50.
<message edited by emofag on Jul 02, 2009 18:46>