Well it certainly doesn' t have the stigma as other drugs. In terms of health risks, they are probably lower than alcohol, especially if you use a vaporizer. They' re expensive and difficult to find, I imagine most people wouldn' t bother with one though.
There are a lot of legal drugs that are far worst than any restricted drug. Sometimes I get the distinct feeling that the government wants to make the drugs that we' re able to produce illegal so they can sell us the drugs they produce. They even have the audacity to give doctors the ability to perscribe most of the so called illegal drugs. The hypocrisy is astounding. The can perscribe speed, coke, meth, just about anything.
There' s nothing inherently evil about any substance, the part of the equation that makes the difference is the responsibility of the person taking the drugs. A person can overdose on anything. You can get poisoning from water if you drink enough. The user should be allowed to make a judgement for themselves. It is our right to make mistakes. If they die from the first shot, that' s natural selection, the next generation will be tougher and smarter. Where' s the logic in impeding this proccess just to save a few losers?
I don' t buy the invisible lines the government sets up so they can consummate wealth and limit personal freedom. At best they are saying people are too stupid to decide what is a worthy way to spend their life.
More importantly, people will do it anyways. They can' t stop it. They aren' t doing a good job of imposing their moral views on other people either.
< Message edited by Agent Ghost -- 21 Mar 08 5:36:33 >