That...doesn' t make sense to me at all!
1) How did MS manage to add a clause that would prevent another company from settling a private matter, by putting a noose around the only innocent party in the whole deal' s neck? That doesn' t seem fair..
So was it Sony' s compassion for a smaller company rather than their arrogance at being sued, that was stopping them from settling all this time?
Or maybe Sony and MS were working together to get Immersion back for sueing them both!
2) I never understood how MS bought a stake in Immersion in the first place when they were suppose to be being sued?? Was it like:
Immersion: " Hey Microsoft, give me money!"
Microsoft: " Uh, ok. How' s about, I give you this fiver, and you give me that tenner?"
Immersion: " OK!"
How does stuff like that happen?
??? Arg, the questions...