never, in all these mass shootings, has there been an NRA-to-the-rescue scenario. There' s never been a quick-witted, cool-headed, prepared and capable average-Joe gun owner who has stepped up and stopped a situation like this.
The ones that get stopped usually don' t end up as mass-murder nationwide news stories now do they?
I' ve read, seen and heard plenty of stories about somebody with a firearm diffusing what could have become a volatile situation. I do agree with you though on one of your ideas, while I support the basic ideals of the NRA (Much like I support the basic ideals of America
), it' s become a lobbyists haven for the higher-ups. We' re always getting letters from the NRA about how you should donate to this or support that and it' s just not right in my opinion. The real rugged Montanan gun owners don' t bother with that political BS anyway.
Restricting what everybody can own isn' t the answer. Restricting what you sell to who is the key. Cho was a psychologically ill child & he bought his handguns from a backwater pawn-shop who was more than happy to sell him one, regardless of a clearly disturbed background.
" Mr. Cho, It seems you' re out of your f****** mind. Would you like us to institutionalise you?"
" Nope."
" Mmmmkay then."
In fact just today there was word on the news that a man shot a kid to death for walking across his lawn with an illegally aquired shotgun. That' s the kind of stuff that gets me riled. He had a criminal background check but somebody wanted to make a couple bucks. We' d be a heck of a lot better off if we started by enforcing the firearms laws we already have.