http://www.gamepro.com/gamepro/international/games/features/83408.shtml

Sorry but starbreeze studios said xbox360 has a better GPU,and they do a multiplattform game,i rather belive them.

Then a gamepro.com site who has no dev kit.

It' s also very sad when they mention Viva Pinata as the 2nd best 360 title,that is just retarded.

That' s a whole lotta bs...

My problem with that reatrded article is when they mention Saint' s row as a " AAA" title instead of games like kameo,doa4 or pgr3.

Or that they consider viva pinat to be the 2nd best looking 360 games.

They are fucking retarded.

" With robust third-party support, hot first-party exclusives, and what we' ve been calling " the Blu-ray advantage," the PS3 will be an unbeatable choice for the serious gamer. But that' s not to say that the Xbox 360 and Wii are somehow inferior to the PS3."

Umm, you just said they were! What a mongo.

Yeah that review was so freaking slanted. Their infor was bs, their criteria for each grade was piss poor, their actual grading was a joke, and the overall article was pathetic.

Erm guys, ...it' s Gamepro...

I mean come on...

Based on our own hands-on experiences with all three systems

...like that means anything at all to anybody except the 12 year olds who buy their retarded publication.

On the other hand, the RSX chip can access the PS3' s auxiliary 256 MB of system RAM, so it once again comes down to programming chops.

And yet if a developer decided to use the 256MB assigned to CELL, it would have to be the whole block. They can' t just take what they need, ...it' s all or nothing, and taking all means CELL gets left with nothing but the 6 usable SPE' s local store memory (256KiB for each) which is worthless. It won' t happen, at least not during gameplay.



What do i think of this?

Very little.

What about price? Did they compare prices or did they only compare things that the ps3 can compete favourably? Graphics? I think there is no proof of any graphical advantage held by ps3 so far over 360. They should wait till it comes out and not be fooled by CG passed of as ingame graphics. Blu ray Advantage - what a bunch of sony PR rubbish. Exclusives? No guarantee this generation - remember Square Enixs stating they neither want ps3 to fail or become too successful - meaning support is wavering - the poor launch numbers and it falling further behind in install base will further convince developers to develop for the other 2 consoles. I also love the politically correct ' disclaimer'

' But that' s not to say that the Xbox 360 and Wii are somehow inferior to the PS3.'

Supposedly to make the list seem ' non biased' .

This is BULL $#!t with a capital S.

Erm guys, ...it' s Gamepro...

I mean come on...

lol, Those were going to be my EXACT words! Though, I was planning to throw a " dude" in there somewhere



Personally, I' m waiting for Sega-AM2, Capcom, Namco, or Konami to tell me what I need to know about how the systems compare.

many lawls upon gamenub

I' m just waiting for the next comment from Epic. <3' s They aren' t afraid of anyone.

My problem with that reatrded article is when they mention Saint' s row as a " AAA" title instead of games like kameo,doa4 or pgr3.

Or that they consider viva pinat to be the 2nd best looking 360 games.

They are fucking retarded.

That is the only thing I really agreed with in it. Saint' s Row is obviously a game that was worked on. Kameo could have been 1,000,000 million times better, don' t get me wrong it isn' t a bad game...just an under-developed one. DoA 4 felt to me like DoA 3 with updated graphics...it brought nothing intriguing to the fighting genre. PGR3 was a great game, but still not near the quality of Saint' s Row.

Saint' s Row was a game I looked at and was impressed by not primarily in gameplay, but in cutscenes. The Cutscenes and Voice acting is top-notch. The biggest fault with Saint' s Row was the Glitches, but come on being able to play chicken with a monorail and a bazooka is some good fun :)

But at the end of the day, we think the PS3 visuals just look more, well, next-gen

I mean WHAT?




Thats just a load of crap! Has anyone (not counting blatant sony fanbois) seen anything on the PS3 that looks better than anything the' ve seen on the 360?

Is it legal to hack a site if its pro sony?

ORIGINAL: QuezcatoL

Is it legal to hack a site if its pro sony?

This hole thing is bs,

first of all, just like Vx said, HAVE THEY EVEN COMPARED PS3 TO 360 GRAPHICS WISE?

next How can they say " If consumer battles were won by sheer CPU speed and power alone, there' d be no next-gen war at all -- Microsoft and Nintendo would already be retreating with their tails between their legs. The PS3' s Cell processor has the downside of being tricky to work with, but will give developers the long-term flexibility they need to pull off radical effects like widespread environment deformation, pixel-perfect ragdoll physics, and massive-scale particle effects without so much as a hitch in the frame rate. Harnessed properly, there' s no doubt that Cell is a processing monster." , win they have no idea what they' re talking about?

And media format, sure ps3 might have more storage space, but it certainly doesnt have more speed, even sony themselves say so

Then about the controller, There is no way the ps3(which is basically the same thing as a ps2 controller with motion sensors and no rumble) is more comfertable than the 360' s, i mean unless your used to playing video games like a guy with crippled hands


plus, " Though it has a hard time keeping up with Sony, the Xbox 360 has some great features to keep you interested in the long run." yeah thats why microsoft is ahead 10,000,000 consoles with decent games coming out and doesnt have to worry about going bankrupt while ps3 will have a measily 500,000 with no good ps3 only games on release and their tv' s flopping to samsung. and gamepro saying ps3 can be the " center of your media" ? why when i got a computer for that and it can download things, and its still not much more than a ps3

And about the game library, RIDGEEEEEEEE RACERRRRRRRRRRRRRR AND MOTORSTORMMMMMMMM!!!!!, enough said

And finally, the " which console gives more bang for the buck" , ps3 got a 4.25 and wii only got a 3.75? why when wii is $250 and actually has promising titles and gameplay, unlike the $600 PS3 that will most likely fail in everything from blue ray to online play, from the controller to the games.

Long story short, Gamepro sucks