I' m not surprised that this didn' t turn out that well actually.

And about previews and reviews. Sometimes they also differ a lot because of the fact that two different people do them. Which I don' t really understand. Sites should let the same person do them if possible.
I' ve seen some sites that had someone into the genre do the preview which turned out well. Then the review comes along by someone who almost detests the genre and it' s almost the opposite impression then. Kind of wrong I think.

Original : Nitro

All previews on mainstream sites should be considered bullshit. If you' ve ever thought otherwise then you' re a fool. Have you never found it strange when sites report that the x cosole build looks and runs just as good as the y console release, and then when the game actually comes out it not only looks noticibly worse but runs worse too? It happens on sites like 1up and IGN all the time. Previews don' t count for shit.

You are taking shots at Too Human arent u ?

Sounds like a budget release to me. Same technology, slight facelift - like the new Painkiller game.

The last game was pretty good, but we' ve come a looooong way since then.

When was the new painkiller game announced ??? But it doesnt matter because , too human > painkiller .

Who is making Painkiller 2? People Can Fly (the first dev) got bought by Epic.

I have to say, I agree with 1UP 100%.

Name me one redeeming factor in the game that deserved anything above a 3 or 4.

ORIGINAL: immortaldanmx

Who is making Painkiller 2? People Can Fly (the first dev) got bought by Epic.

MindWare Studios

Played the demo, wasnt 3/10 of bad. I liked the qte for one.

I also think reviews are a bit silly, but generaly bad games get 3/10 all round and good games or hyped ones get 10/10.. all round.

I also think reviews are a bit silly, but generaly bad games get 3/10 all round and good games or hyped ones get 10/10.. all round.

so true.