ORIGINAL: Abasoufiane
yes i did , the first one on xbox , not black and the camera is not terrible... but you guys miss my point, if it was any otehr game , i would not show a lack of respect , but this is coming from a cocky bastard:
1) my game is the best action game ever ( i' ll say go *** yourself)
2) he made fun of his collegues working on sigma saying he' s game we' ll be much better.
3) sluty characters (childish perv) and very weak storyline.
4) a game that is released a year or so after sigma, and reminisces of XBOX graphics is a true shame, i bet that' s a major reason why he' s superior was pissed off.
Ok, so we' ve established that the " terrible" camera isn;t actually " terrible" at all. that' s fine, ...now we can disregard it.
1) Ninja Gaiden Black/Sigma is at this point, as far as many action game fans are concerned - the best action game ever. It' s not hard to comprehend what he' s saying. The sequel to the best action game ever will be the new best action game ever. It looks and plays like Ninja Gaiden but it' s bigger, better, flashier and more brutal. I' ll let you know when i' ve played it whether it' s the best action game ever, but i doubt i' ll be disappointed.
2) Sigma is what Sigma is. It' s an updated port of Itagaki' s original Xbox title. It' s as kickass as the original because it is essentially the same game. Itagaki saying that II wil be better than Sigma is Itagaki saying it will be the best Ninja Gaiden game ever developed. Japanese - English/whatever translations often lose a lot of their meaning... so i highly doubt he was actually being offensive. If he was, maybe he simply didn' t agree with the PS3 port. That' d be understandable. If Tecmo was pushing for a PS3 port and Itagaki said he didn' t want to have anything to do with it... when it came to promoting his own direct sequel, you wouln' t expect him to praise it.
3) It' s a culture thing. If you haven' t been to Japan you probably wouldn' t understand.
4) NGII looks better than Sigma. I have Sigma, i bought it the day it came out - so i would know. It' s not massively different but the particle effects, number of enemies on screen, textures, lighting and enemy character models are all better to some degree or another. Again, i won' t be able to say what' s different until i' ve actually played the game for myself and seen it first hand on my TV but i suspect that without a complete engine overhaul this is as good as it gets. It looks as good as DMC4, just stylistically different. I don' t see the problem. It runs at 60fps too.
ORIGINAL: Evilkiller
I think in Dead or Alive 4 the AI is excellent. It adopted to my way of playing and I had to constantly switch strategies to be able to win, especially on higher difficulties.
DoA4 is notorious for having the cheapest enemy AI in any fighting game. Don' t try to make it something it' s not.