ORIGINAL: UnluckyOne
ORIGINAL: Majikdra6on
I stopped reading after the first two poorly written sentences. Optimus is a f*cking moron and aways has been.
Umm... Care to elaborate? A post like this doesn' t do much for your credibility either.
You say that like i should care what you, or any other person here thinks. I don' t.
Would i care to elaborate?! Sure. It' s poorly written.
" PS3 CPU information provided by Sony"
*laughs uncontrollably* He " suggests" an awful lot of things, some right and some wrong and while the final outcome of 360 having more provable performance than PS3 is correct - things like this...
The 360’s DVD drive pulls information off of a 12X DVD disc twice as fast as the PS3’s 2X Blu-Ray does off of a Blu-Ray disc. The 360’s 12 DVD drive has a speed of 16.5 megabytes per second compared to the PS3’s 2X Blu-ray drive which has a speed of 8.7 megabytes per second.
...are completely false.
The CAV drive in 360 only achieves 12x for approx 15% of the outer disc, and 5x on the inner ring, averaging at 8x. Since it can only read single layer discs at 12x, limited to 8x when reading dual-layer DVD' s, and since most 360 games are pressed on DVD9 it' s maxing out at 8x nearly 100% of the time. 16MB/s is peak performance when reading DVD5, not DVD9.
PS3' s 2x BD-Rom drive has a transfer rate of 8-9MB/s. The differences are negligible. He doesn' t know what he' s talking about.
Why is he a moron?! Because he' regurgitating information he read elsewhere and simply paraphrasing it. You can see where most of it is from
HERE
< Message edited by MAJIKDRA6ON -- 19 Nov 06 9:56:03 >